Sunday, April 27, 2025

NaPoWriMo 2025 (April 27th): Nothing endures but the whim of the breeze

From NaPoWriMo 2025 (Day Twenty Seven): Happy Sunday, everyone. I hope you find it to be a relaxing and inspiring day for writing poems.

Our featured participant for the day is Hayaathi – Goddess of Sehnsucht, whose first attempt at a sonnet brings a lovely blend of grief and self-deprecating humor.

Today’s daily resource is the online collection of the Harvard Art Museums, where you can find this bright and pretty drawing of a tulip poplar, a rather forbidding poster comparing various causes of death in Wisconsin, this beautiful jade paperweight, and much more.

And now for today’s optional prompt. W.H. Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” takes its inspiration from a very particular painting: Breughel’s “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus.” Today we’d like to challenge you to write your own poem that describes a detail in a  painting, and that begins, like Auden’s poem, with a grand, declarative statement.

Happy writing!

Nothing endures but the whim of the breeze

The kingdoms of men crumble faster than a clover’s sigh.
In the painting, a man is tied to the cannon's yawning mouth —
forgotten now by the breeze that carries away screams like pollen.

Even walls remember our names.
In the corner, a boy stoops, unnoticed,
Plucking a single dandelion from the mud,
While armies sharpen swords nearby, deaf to the golden hush.
A peeling mural on a battered building
whispers of those who leaned and laughed here.

Empires may forget, but paint remembers where we leaned.

Hidden now by ivy:
a gold mine of raw, explosive, burning material,
laughing where no one sees.

Beneath the crumbling sunburst, a corner:
Two children, handprints smeared in blue,

History is carved by calloused hands:
a hammer, an exhausted eye, a soot-stained shirt button.

Walls crumble faster than promises:
a tiny kiss, cracked barbed wire, broken slogans.

Roots run deeper than exile:
a single corn stalk, a hummingbird, a mother’s weary glance.

Peace is the sharpest blade:
a child peeking from behind riot shields.

Dreams are stitched in daylight:
someone sewing a quilt, a window left ajar.

Color blooms where concrete crushes:
a tiny slingshot tucked into a belt.

Earth keeps the receipts of betrayal:
a river spirit hidden in a swirl, a cracked feather.

In the earth’s bitter marrow:
an arsenal of raw, explosive, burning roots,
a gold mine buried in betrayal.

Because political is personal.
It’s not some distant, sterile thing happening in suits and marble rooms:
It’s your grandmother’s missing land.
It’s the factory smoke in your lungs.
It’s the job you didn’t get because of your name.
It’s how your body is read (or misread) walking down the street.
It’s the mural you paint because you were never meant to survive,
the temple you build from broken, stained glass,
the arsenal hidden under the cobblestones.

History chews up its bravest children.
A lone sneaker dangles from a power line,
paint dripping down like blood.
I once wore shoes just like that,
running from a future sharpening knives for me,
running from a fate already closing its fists.

But tomorrow, barefoot, I will plant myself deeper, braver.

Empires die of amnesia.

No flag remembers the hands that sewed it.
On the mural’s cracked belly, a boy
traces his own face:
brown, wide-eyed, defiant:
beside the bullet holes they forgot to paint over.

He smiles like a sunrise they can't bomb away.
It was always political because it was always personal.

- Oizys.

Note: This poem was born from Vasily Vereshchagin’s 1884 painting, "Blowing from Guns in British India," which depicts the execution of Namdhari Sikhs by British colonial forces in 1872. In the scene, a man is tied to a cannon, seconds away from a death so brutal it was meant to be both punishment and spectacle. The silence was visible not in faces, but in posture, in the way soldiers stood, in the way the crowd blurred at the edges, anonymous and unmoving. I kept thinking how history doesn’t only survive in the monuments of the victors. It lives in the quiet places too: a child's handprint under ivy, a forgotten mural on a crumbling wall, a slingshot tucked into a belt. This poem is a small act of remembrance for the unnamed, the unnoticed, the ones the breeze could never quite erase.

Saturday, April 26, 2025

NaPoWriMo 2025 (April 26th): Daughters of Dust and Diamonds

From NaPoWriMo 2025 (Day Twenty Six): We finally made it to the weekend, everyone! 

Today’s featured participant is Eden Ligon, whose “live concert” poem for Day Twenty-Five shows all the sweetness of music that has ripened with time.

Our daily resource is the online collection of Spain’s Reina Sofia Museum, which houses an incredible collection of modern and contemporary art. You can find Picassos aplenty here, of course, but also things like this vertiginous sculpture that makes me think of a rollercoaster, this mysterious Magritte, and this collaboration between Andy Warhol and Jean-Michel Basquiat.

And now for our daily (optional) prompt. The word “sonnet” comes directly from the Italian sonetto, or “little song.” A traditional sonnet has a strict meter and rhyme scheme. It’s a strange form to have wormed its way into English, which is relatively unmetrical and rhyme-poor compared to Romance languages like Italian.

But thanks to William Shakespeare, Edmund Spenser, and others, the sonnet in English bloomed. It also became a sort of rite of passage for poets, with the Victorians especially loving very strict sonnets.

To refresh you on the “rules” of the traditional sonnet:

  • 14 lines
  • 10 syllables per line
  • Those syllables are divided into five iambic feet. (An iamb is an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed syllable). The word “admit” is a good example. In pronouncing it, you put more stress on the “mit” than the “ad.”
  • Rhyme schemes vary, but the Shakespearean sonnet is abab cdcd efef gg (three quatrains followed by a concluding couplet).
  • Sonnets are often thought of as not just little songs, but little essays, with the first six-to-eight or so lines building up a problem, the next four-to-six discussing it, and the last two-to-four coming to a conclusion.
  • Given all these rules, it’s perhaps surprising that love poems make up quite a chunk of sonnets in English, but maybe that’s just because love poems make up quite a chunk of all poems in English?

If you want to intimidate yourself about poetry in general and sonnets in particular, read this quote from Saintsbury’s History of English Prosody.

To have something to say; to say it under pretty strict limits of form and very strict ones of space; to say it forcibly; to say it beautifully; these are the four great requirements of the poet in general; but they are never set so clearly, so imperatively, so urgently before any variety of poet as before the sonneteer.

And now, by way of illustration, let’s take a look at a few contemporary takes on the sonnet. The first, by Dan Beachy-Quick, is a pretty strict traditional sonnet. The next two –by Terrence Hayes and Alice Notley – are looser. And finally, the last one, by June Jordan, is a rather strict sonnet (rhyme- and meter-wise, though somewhat looser in line-specific syllable count) that doesn’t sound strict at all. It is joyfully informal in its language and tone.

After all this, here’s your prompt! Try your hand at a sonnet – or at least something “sonnet-shaped.” Think about the concept of the sonnet as a song, and let the format of a song inform your attempt. Be as strict or not strict as you want.

Happy writing!

Daughters of Dust and Diamonds

They clad us in silk, but stitched us in chains,
Our laughter bought with blood, our songs with sighs,
We wore their pleasures like embroidered stains,
A garden caged beneath a painted sky.

You crowned our throats with coins, not diadems,
Fed hunger with illusions of a throne,
Yet we, who danced within your stratagems,
Bent music till the very walls were stone.

No master's hand shall write our epitaph,
No borrowed tool shall build our freedom's flight,
We are the storm, the silence, and the laugh,
We break — we burn — we blaze — we birth — we fight.

Each daughter bears a hammer in her breast;
We raze your house to raise our own red crest.

- Oizys,
(The Sonneteeress)
[Since I learned the word "sonneteer" today. Please don't kill me. I won't use it again. Ha, ha.]

Note: This poem maintains the traditional sonnet structure: 14 lines with approximately 10 syllables each organized into three quatrains and a final couplet. It follows the Shakespearean rhyme scheme (abab cdcd efef gg). In my poem, the "E" rhymes (epitaph and laugh), are not perfect. They form a slant/near rhyme, which is common and accepted in English poetry. As for the iambic pentameter, I tried my best. Then I laughed and gave up! So now: Accuracy in iambic pentameter is about flow, not perfection. We honor the spirit of the meter, not enslave ourselves to it. Just like Lorde said: "The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house." By breaking a few rules, I am actually adhering more closely to the theme of my poem: rebellion, reinvention, and radical self-construction (tool by tool, step by step).